1.
goals and preparation
clarify the goal before starting (compare the bandwidth stability and packet loss rate before and after vietnam's cn2 link). preparation: two test machines (one at domestic export or upstream, one at vietnam/cn2 entrance), linux environment, administrator rights, installation tools: iperf3, mtr, ping, traceroute, curl, jq (for json parsing), and the ability to log in remotely.2.
network environment confirmation and baseline collection plan
confirm the test time period (it is recommended to take at least 3 days each during working hours and non-peak hours, and sample by time period). set the sampling frequency: iperf3 once an hour (60 seconds, -t 60), ping 100 packets each time (interval 0.2), mtr 100 times periodic sampling each time, http download/multi-thread wget/curl speed test once an hour. record router and server bandwidth limitations and concurrent traffic.3.
deploy iperf3 server
execute on the vietnamese machine: sudo apt-get install iperf3; nohup iperf3 -s &>/dev/null 2&>&1 &. running on domestic machine: iperf3 -c4.
ping and packet loss rate collection
use standard commands to collect packet loss and delay distribution: ping -c 100 -i 0.2 <target ip> > ping-$(date +%f-%h%m).log. example of extracting packet loss rate: cat ping-xxx.log | tail -n1 | awk -f',' '{print $3}'. batch scripts can be executed in a loop and written to csv.5.
mtr path and packet loss location
run mtr or traceroute to determine the link where packet loss occurs: mtr -r -c 100 <target ip> > mtr-$(date).log. focus on packet loss and latency hops where bandwidth changes (%loss column). record the ip of the intermediate router with high packet loss to facilitate communication with the operator.6.
bandwidth stability test at http/download level
build or use a static large file (200mb) http server in vietnam. in china, use curl -o /dev/null -s -w "%{speed_download}\n" http://7.
logging and data centralization
unify iperf3 json, ping logs, mtr logs, and curl speed output to an analysis machine (via scp or rsync), and the file names include timestamps. create a directory structure classified by date/period to facilitate historical comparison.8.
data analysis and calculation of indicators
use jq to parse iperf3 json: cat file.json | jq '.end.sum_received.bits_per_second' to extract bandwidth and calculate the average, maximum, minimum and standard deviation of each group of tests (implemented by python/pandas or awk). the packet loss rate is extracted from the ping log and the average packet loss and 95th percentile delay are calculated.9.
visualization and comparison methods
import the processed csv into excel, grafana or use matplotlib to draw a graph, draw a time series graph (bandwidth, packet loss, delay) and mark the cn2 link activation time point. compare the average bandwidth, jitter, and packet loss rate reduction percentage during the same period before and after activation.10.
sample analysis and statistical testing
to avoid accidental effects, use at least 7 days of data to do a t test or mann-whitney u test to verify whether the bandwidth average and packet loss rate are significantly improved. python example: use scipy.stats.ttest_ind(before_values, after_values, equal_var=false). if p-value < 0.05, the improvement can be considered significant.11.
positioning and operator communication process
if it is found that a certain hop has high packet loss, sort out the mtr path, time period, and sample logs and submit them to cn2/vietnam peer operator. attached are the bidirectional test results of iperf3 and ping/traceroute so that they can troubleshoot at the mpls/pe level.12.
continuous monitoring and alarm suggestions
deploy continuous monitoring after production goes online: use prometheus + blackbox_exporter to schedule ping/http, and incorporate iperf3 short tests into cron (for example, 4 times a day). set threshold alarm: when packet loss is >1% or bandwidth is lower than the threshold, the alarm will be triggered and detailed logs will be automatically collected and sent to sre.13.
common misunderstandings and precautions
avoid only doing a single test to draw conclusions: concurrency, time period, and route fluctuations will all affect the results; ensure that there are no other large traffic tasks during the test period; use the -p parameter in iperf3 to avoid single-flow saturation and not reflect the overall link capability.14.
q: how to judge whether the vietnam cn2 link really improves the packet loss rate?
answer: by comparing multi-day statistical data (average packet loss, 95th percentile delay, packet loss burst frequency) in the same time period before and after cn2 is enabled, and using statistical tests (such as t-test) to verify whether the changes are significant; at the same time, combined with mtr path positioning, it is confirmed that packet loss points are removed or decreased as cn2 routing changes.
15.
q: if i find that packet loss is high on a certain hop, how should i communicate with the operator?
answer: prepare: 1) mtr/traceroute log (including timestamp); 2) original files of ping and iperf3; 3) description of the time window and frequency of the problem. submit a work order and ask the other party to troubleshoot the corresponding pe/link and provide forwarding/packet loss logs. if necessary, ask for real-time packet capture (tcpdump).
16.
q: how can i automate these tests and preserve the results long-term?
answer: write a cron script to execute iperf3/ping/curl regularly, output json/csv and upload it to a centralized storage (such as s3 or internal nas); use prometheus to capture indicators and visualize them in grafana, set alarm rules and retain at least 30 days of original logs for retrospective analysis.

- Latest articles
- Current Status Of The U.s. High-defense Server Rental Market And Selection Suggestions
- Analysis Of The Advantages And Disadvantages Of Japan's Native Ip Optical Computing Cloud Phone And Traditional Voip Services
- How To Rent A Cloud Server In Vietnam And Ensure Network Quality And Service Stability With Limited Budget
- Can I Open A Roaming Server In Malaysia? Deployment Cost And Maintenance Guide For Enterprises
- How To Choose Malaysia Vps Cn2 Gia Server Plan Comparison Guide Suitable For E-commerce
- How Do Small And Medium-sized Sellers Choose Japanese Site Group Servers, Taking Into Account Both Cost And Performance?
- Comparative Analysis Of Purchasing Suggestions And Configurations Of 10 Us Site Group Servers
- Korean Kt Native Ip Application Process And Practical Guide For Operator Package Selection
- How To Use Vietnam Cn2 To Maximize Access Speed In The Asia-pacific Region
- Steps And Precautions For Migrating Local Services To Taiwan Cloud Server Amazon
- Popular tags
-
Which Vietnam Cloud Server Is Better? How Does It Compare In Terms Of Price And Traffic Billing?
compare the differences in price and traffic billing of cloud servers in vietnam, including interpretations of bandwidth billing, traffic-based billing, peak bandwidth and tiered billing, and provide purchase and architecture suggestions, recommending dexun telecommunications as the preferred supplier. -
Vietnam Cn2 Vps Usage Experience And Customer Feedback
in-depth discussion of the usage experience and customer feedback of cn2 vps in vietnam, to understand its performance, stability and applicable scenarios, and to recommend the high-quality services of dexun telecommunications. -
How Much Does A Server In Vietnam Cost? Choose The Right Service Provider
this article will explore the price of servers in vietnam and how to choose a suitable service provider, including specific configurations, cases and data analysis.